CSV export
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to CA1
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1676 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Field CA1 | moderate | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In hippocampus, terminal labeling is restricted to CA1 & subiculum & is predominantly present in the inner 1/2 of the molecular layer. --Fig2A: mod/dense--. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1677 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Field CA1 | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes Terminal labeling is prominent in the inner half of molecular layers of CA1 & adjacent part of subiculum.. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1678 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Field CA1 | moderate | PHAL | Case pg194-5, fig1,2B. Soma notes In a 4th rat, inj placed approx 1mm caudal to case1, in similar medlat posn. Immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III of LEA. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes A labeled terminal field is further present in molecular layer of CA1, predominantnly in its inner 1/2, but labeling weaker than that in FD --Fig2B: moderate--. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1679 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Field CA1 | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to DG
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1680 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Dentate gyrus | very light | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes No label is present in the FD.. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1681 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Dentate gyrus | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In addition a few labeled fibres are present in the outer 1/3 of the molecular layer of the FD. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1682 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Dentate gyrus | light | PHAL | Case pg194-5, fig1,2B. Soma notes In a 4th rat, inj placed approx 1mm caudal to case1, in similar medlat posn. Immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III of LEA. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes this inj results in heavy labeling in outer 1/3 of molecular layer of FD. --Fig2B: dense--. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1683 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Dentate gyrus | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to SUB
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1684 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In hippocampus, terminal labeling is restricted to CA1 & subiculum & is predominantly present in the inner 1/2 of the molecular layer. --Fig2A: not clear--. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1685 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes Terminal labeling is prominent in the inner half of molecular layers of CA1 & adjacent part of subiculum.. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1686 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to CA1
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1687 | Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zone | Field CA1 | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to DG
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1688 | Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zone | Dentate gyrus | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to SUB
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1689 | Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zone | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |