CSV export

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to CA1

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1676 Entorhinal area, lateral partField CA1 moderatePHAL
Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In hippocampus, terminal labeling is restricted to CA1 & subiculum & is predominantly present in the inner 1/2 of the molecular layer. --Fig2A: mod/dense--.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1677 Entorhinal area, lateral partField CA1 existsPHAL
Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes Terminal labeling is prominent in the inner half of molecular layers of CA1 & adjacent part of subiculum..
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1678 Entorhinal area, lateral partField CA1 moderatePHAL
Case pg194-5, fig1,2B. Soma notes In a 4th rat, inj placed approx 1mm caudal to case1, in similar medlat posn. Immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III of LEA. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes A labeled terminal field is further present in molecular layer of CA1, predominantnly in its inner 1/2, but labeling weaker than that in FD --Fig2B: moderate--.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1679 Entorhinal area, lateral partField CA1 existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to DG

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1680 Entorhinal area, lateral partDentate gyrus very lightPHAL
Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes No label is present in the FD..
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1681 Entorhinal area, lateral partDentate gyrus existsPHAL
Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In addition a few labeled fibres are present in the outer 1/3 of the molecular layer of the FD.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1682 Entorhinal area, lateral partDentate gyrus lightPHAL
Case pg194-5, fig1,2B. Soma notes In a 4th rat, inj placed approx 1mm caudal to case1, in similar medlat posn. Immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III of LEA. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes this inj results in heavy labeling in outer 1/3 of molecular layer of FD. --Fig2B: dense--.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1683 Entorhinal area, lateral partDentate gyrus existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to SUB

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1684 Entorhinal area, lateral partSubiculum existsPHAL
Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In hippocampus, terminal labeling is restricted to CA1 & subiculum & is predominantly present in the inner 1/2 of the molecular layer. --Fig2A: not clear--.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1685 Entorhinal area, lateral partSubiculum existsPHAL
Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes Terminal labeling is prominent in the inner half of molecular layers of CA1 & adjacent part of subiculum..
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
1686 Entorhinal area, lateral partSubiculum existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to CA1

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1687 Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zoneField CA1 existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to DG

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1688 Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zoneDentate gyrus existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided

Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTm to SUB

To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.

Report IDSending structure Receiving structureProjection strengthTechniqueGeneral description projectionCollatorAssociated reference
1689 Entorhinal area medial part, dorsal zoneSubiculum existsPHAL
Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields.
Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988
General description technique/protocol: not provided