Details about the neuroanatomical projections from ENTl to SUB
To view more data and metadata associated with each report, click on its ID.
Report ID | Sending structure | Receiving structure | Projection strength | Technique | General description projection | Collator | Associated reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1684 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1,2A. Soma notes In case 1, inj site involves rostral & most lateral part of LEA, close to rhinal sulcus (Fig1). Majority of immunoreactive neurons are found in layers II & III & a small number are labeled in layer IV. --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes In hippocampus, terminal labeling is restricted to CA1 & subiculum & is predominantly present in the inner 1/2 of the molecular layer. --Fig2A: not clear--. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1685 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg194, fig1. Soma notes Inj site centred in layers II & III of LEA, slightly caudal to that of case2 (fig1) --no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes Terminal labeling is prominent in the inner half of molecular layers of CA1 & adjacent part of subiculum.. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 | |
1686 | Entorhinal area, lateral part | Subiculum | exists | PHAL | Case pg195, fig1. Soma notes More caudally placed injections in LEA & MEA (cases5-8) ?--no figs of inj sites-. Terminal notes ?all result in labeling in FD, CA1 & subiculum. With exception of case 6 in which density of labeling in FD = that in CA1, the labeling in FD is more dense than in other hippocampal subfields. | Witter MP, Griffioen AW, Jorritsma-Byham B, Krijne, 1988 |
General description technique/protocol: not provided |
Further details associated to record number 1686:
|
|
---|